[Thu May 17 09:25:27 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (252.3, 395.1) = 16 55 20.72 -41 3 28.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 62.0 +/- 11.4 Background counts = 17.5 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Thu May 17 09:25:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.77' [Thu May 17 13:59:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 17 13:59:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.31" [Thu May 17 13:59:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.092 [Thu May 17 13:59:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 10.31" [Thu May 17 15:31:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 17 15:31:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Thu May 17 15:31:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 17 15:31:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Thu May 17 15:31:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 17 15:31:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 17 15:31:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 17 15:31:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 17 15:31:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 17 15:31:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 12.553270 pixels away [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 17 21:11:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 17 21:11:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.31" [Thu May 17 21:11:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.092 [Thu May 17 21:11:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 10.31" [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 17 22:32:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Source 14 is offset by -6.167715 and 5.349902 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.813099 x 0.813099, not incorporating fit results [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 18 00:01:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 18 02:54:43 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21904.824799, 34326.801514, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 18 02:54:43 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14_src.reg [Fri May 18 02:54:43 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (215, 358) - (290, 433) [Fri May 18 02:54:43 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21904.824799, 34326.801514, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24039.260400, 32089.203400, 788.007223, 788.007223, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21960.967408, 32675.853000, 736.835025, 736.835025, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 18 02:54:43 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14.gif [Fri May 18 03:01:27 2012] Mean detx,y = (7218.57, -4822.04) [Fri May 18 03:01:31 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri May 18 03:01:59 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri May 18 03:01:59 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri May 18 03:01:59 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14_bgd.pi.gz [Fri May 18 03:30:22 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 61 counts [Fri May 18 03:30:22 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Fri May 18 04:18:09 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Fri May 18 04:18:09 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri May 18 04:18:11 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Fri May 18 04:18:11 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00284, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0602020101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src14.arf [Fri May 18 04:18:11 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Fri May 18 04:18:11 2012] Updating source flux to 5.3e-14 [Fri May 18 04:18:20 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting