[Sat Feb 18 10:45:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.2, 324.2) = 1 52 58.82 -13 43 4.3
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.7 +/- 14.3
  Background counts = 249.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Feb 18 10:45:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.69'
[Sat Feb 18 15:29:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Feb 18 15:29:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.78"
[Sat Feb 18 15:29:22 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.812
[Sat Feb 18 15:29:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 7.78"
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 18:18:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61 appears to have run properly
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Source 70 is offset by 1.160774 and -7.917678 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.150069 x 7.150069, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Feb 18 20:46:06 2012] Source is confused with source 32
[Sun Feb 19 01:37:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 19 01:37:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.78"
[Sun Feb 19 01:37:58 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.812
[Sun Feb 19 01:37:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 7.78"
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 19 03:37:46 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0602010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 70 at 15.470810 pixels away
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7340.530000, observed total counts = 7337.000000
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 9.369016 pixels
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 57 to 20
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] 4343.510000 total counts/ 3205.030000 bgd. counts: snr = 20.109874
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 9.369016 pixels
  Position = (332.2, 318.0) = 1 52 56.74 -13 43 41.1
  Extent = 30.9 (30.9-61.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1138.5 +/- 65.9
  Background counts = 3205.0
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0007
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1348.880000, observed total counts = 1346.000000
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 1.266076 pixels
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 20 to 57
[Sun Feb 19 05:35:44 2012] 1106.882400 total counts/ 1074.570000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.985716
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 1.266076 pixels
  Position = (332.2, 319.2) = 1 52 56.75 -13 43 35.6
  Extent = 3.5 (1.9-7.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 32.3 +/- 33.3
  Background counts = 1074.6
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability