[Sat Jun 2 12:35:22 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (238.0, 321.8) = 3 34 20.18 -38 57 39.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 263.6 +/- 28.1 Background counts = 234.5 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0007 [Sat Jun 2 12:35:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.70' [Sat Jun 2 12:41:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 2 12:41:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78" [Sat Jun 2 12:41:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.986 [Sat Jun 2 12:41:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.78" [Sat Jun 2 13:36:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 13:36:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 13:36:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 13:36:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 13:36:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 13:36:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 13:36:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 13:36:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 13:36:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 13:36:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Source 15 is offset by 6.947103 and -7.189260 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.872975 x 0.872975, not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 2 15:05:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 2 15:06:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 2 15:06:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78" [Sat Jun 2 15:06:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.986 [Sat Jun 2 15:06:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.78" [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Sat Jun 2 15:54:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 932.329000, observed total counts = 811.000000 [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 2 17:04:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 2 17:04:49 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(20654.306000, 27947.626343, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jun 2 17:04:49 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src.reg [Sat Jun 2 17:04:49 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (200, 284) - (275, 359) [Sat Jun 2 17:04:49 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(20654.306000, 27947.626343, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17938.011902, 26873.239532, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22891.730400, 25907.519800, 433.964012, 433.964012, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jun 2 17:04:49 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15.gif [Sat Jun 2 17:16:23 2012] Mean detx,y = (4212.10, 3461.81) [Sat Jun 2 17:16:26 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat Jun 2 17:16:47 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat Jun 2 17:16:48 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Jun 2 17:16:48 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Jun 2 17:45:35 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat Jun 2 17:45:35 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Jun 2 19:19:31 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Jun 2 19:19:31 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Jun 2 19:19:32 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Jun 2 19:19:32 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00694, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0601930201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15.arf [Sat Jun 2 19:19:32 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Jun 2 19:19:32 2012] Updating source flux to 2.1e-14 [Sat Jun 2 19:21:01 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting