[Tue May 14 01:00:17 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (162.6, 402.1) = 5 28 12.73 -63 36 22.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 230.7 +/- 18.6 Background counts = 16.6 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001 [Tue May 14 01:00:18 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.39' [Tue May 14 01:03:08 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 14 01:03:08 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.62" [Tue May 14 01:03:08 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 47, frac = 1.015 [Tue May 14 01:03:08 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 12.62" [Tue May 14 02:23:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists [Tue May 14 02:23:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Tue May 14 02:23:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue May 14 02:23:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Tue May 14 02:23:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 14 02:23:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Tue May 14 02:23:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue May 14 02:23:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue May 14 02:23:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue May 14 02:23:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Source 17 is offset by -5.365725 and 7.710679 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.368952 x 1.368952, not incorporating fit results [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 5 [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 14 03:30:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 14 03:30:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 14 03:30:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.62" [Tue May 14 03:30:45 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 47, frac = 1.015 [Tue May 14 03:30:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 12.62" [Tue May 14 04:32:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Tue May 14 04:32:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Tue May 14 04:32:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue May 14 04:32:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Tue May 14 04:32:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 14 04:32:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Tue May 14 04:32:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue May 14 04:32:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue May 14 04:32:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue May 14 04:32:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 439.280000, observed total counts = 322.000000 [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 14 05:24:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 14 05:25:13 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(14100.267944, 34938.345032, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 14 05:25:13 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src.reg [Tue May 14 05:25:13 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (125, 365) - (200, 440) [Tue May 14 05:25:13 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(14100.267944, 34938.345032, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15010.065506, 33272.815948, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 14 05:25:13 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.gif [Tue May 14 05:35:13 2013] Mean detx,y = (6915.25, 13965.45) [Tue May 14 05:35:16 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue May 14 05:35:41 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue May 14 05:35:42 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 14 05:35:42 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601830301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_bgd.pi.gz