[Mon Feb 13 03:53:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.1, 237.5) = 11 9 27.62 -3 42 11.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 22.8 +/- 6.5
  Background counts = 4.9
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Feb 13 03:53:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.39'
[Mon Feb 13 04:46:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 13 04:46:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.13"
[Mon Feb 13 04:46:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.111
[Mon Feb 13 04:46:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 9.13"
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 04:59:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Source 11 is offset by 5.877045 and 7.843490 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.048938 x 1.048938, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 13 05:09:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 13 05:42:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 13 05:42:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.13"
[Mon Feb 13 05:42:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.111
[Mon Feb 13 05:42:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 9.13"
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:55:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 13 05:59:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 64.953600, observed total counts = 65.000000
[Mon Feb 13 05:59:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.080206 pixels
[Mon Feb 13 05:59:46 2012] 64.353100 total counts/ 52.305400 bgd. counts: snr = 1.665831
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.080206 pixels
  Position = (341.1, 237.5) = 11 9 27.60 -3 42 10.8
  Extent = 2.9 (2.3-6.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.0 +/- 8.0
  Background counts = 52.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability