[Mon Mar 12 05:53:32 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (311.6, 259.4) = 14 36 19.02 58 46 35.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 46.5 +/- 10.7
  Background counts = 7.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Mon Mar 12 05:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.98'
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.92"
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.068
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.92"
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 09:25:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 334.633000, observed total counts = 453.000000
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:17 2012] Source is confused with source 5
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.92"
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.068
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.92"
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 20.913730 pixels away
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9