[Mon Mar 12 05:53:10 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (321.2, 305.3) = 14 36 13.60 58 49 46.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 67.2 +/- 11.0 Background counts = 8.0 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Mon Mar 12 05:53:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.72' [Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.29" [Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.056 [Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.29" [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 10.095532 pixels away [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.29" [Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.056 [Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.29" [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source 7 is offset by -6.502578 and 6.044722 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.838037 x 0.838037, not incorporating fit results [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0