[Mon Mar 12 05:53:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (275.8, 270.4) = 14 36 39.03 58 47 10.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.0 +/- 9.9
  Background counts = 9.3
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Mon Mar 12 05:53:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.62'
[Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.74"
[Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.770
[Mon Mar 12 07:58:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 7.74"
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 08:18:22 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Source 10 is offset by -2.226831 and -7.759561 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.228462 x 1.228462, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 09:26:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.74"
[Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.770
[Mon Mar 12 11:58:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 7.74"
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:10:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 80.316340 pixels away
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source 10 is offset by -3.605302 and -7.269056 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.889251 x 7.114023, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 13:09:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9