[Thu Mar 29 09:04:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.5, 292.0) = 13 35 50.99 3 1 4.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 32.6 +/- 8.8
  Background counts = 10.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Thu Mar 29 09:04:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.31'
[Thu Mar 29 10:06:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 10:06:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Thu Mar 29 10:06:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.103
[Thu Mar 29 10:06:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 7.09"
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 10:50:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Source 9 is offset by -6.018829 and -7.531249 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.814446 x 0.814446, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 29 11:45:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 29 12:50:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 12:50:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Thu Mar 29 12:50:57 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.103
[Thu Mar 29 12:50:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 7.09"
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:11 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15 appears to have run properly
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 13:32:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601781201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly
[Thu Mar 29 14:20:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 213.917000, observed total counts = 214.000000
[Thu Mar 29 14:20:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.527712 pixels
[Thu Mar 29 14:20:46 2012] 218.489350 total counts/ 209.387000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.629041
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.527712 pixels
  Position = (281.1, 292.4) = 13 35 51.10 3 1 4.7
  Extent = 1.8" x 1.8", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.1 +/- 14.8
  Background counts = 209.4
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability