[Tue Jun 18 01:26:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (299.9, 336.1) = 12 23 25.08 2 41 55.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 133.7 +/- 19.1
  Background counts = 20.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jun 18 01:26:18 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.74'
[Tue Jun 18 01:28:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 18 01:28:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80"
[Tue Jun 18 01:28:41 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.666
[Tue Jun 18 01:28:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.80"
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 18 05:17:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2374.480000, observed total counts = 1428.000000
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Source 23 is offset by -1.157897 and 8.242858 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.094115 x 7.094115, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Source is confused with source 21
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:12 2013] Source is confused with source 24
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:36 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:36 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80"
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:36 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.666
[Tue Jun 18 06:50:36 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 7.80"
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 18 10:25:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2373.770000, observed total counts = 1428.000000
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Source 23 is offset by -1.157897 and 8.241846 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.886763 x 0.886763, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:32 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26045.950989, 29196.440613, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:32 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:32 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (262, 299) - (337, 374)
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:32 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26045.950989, 29196.440613, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26274.537200, 27863.277200, 1486.473643, 1463.990442, 1.763090, X, Y) && !ellipse(24374.886600, 31480.442000, 399.594411, 399.594411, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26694.811800, 30078.940200, 1309.024038, 249.886407, 101.618600, X, Y) && !ellipse(26588.986786, 29558.177734, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24993.294400, 29627.819800, 692.632820, 348.587210, 9.586710, X, Y) && !ellipse(25582.173126, 28984.489624, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23974.013916, 29272.828461, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25163.870605, 28777.808868, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27879.535461, 26761.324738, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 18 11:22:32 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif
[Tue Jun 18 11:38:36 2013] Mean detx,y = (237.34, -1383.07) 
[Tue Jun 18 11:38:38 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jun 18 11:38:58 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jun 18 11:38:59 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 18 11:38:59 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 18 12:26:39 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Jun 18 12:26:39 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz = 969.00
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_bgd.pi.gz = 1062.00
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Got source and background scale factors 889441.000000, 4224492.000000
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (299.9, 336.1) = 12 23 25.08 2 41 55.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 745.4 +/- 32.1
  Background aperture counts = 223.6
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:44 2013] Set source signif. to 745.40/14.95 = 49.85
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:52 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:52 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0772, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.arf
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:52 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jun 18 13:57:52 2013] Updating source flux to 2.4e-13
[Tue Jun 18 13:58:02 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Tue Jun 18 13:58:17 2013] xmm0601781001/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0601781001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete