[Sun Jul 15 01:52:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (396.8, 216.3) = 20 43 46.13 -10 50 18.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 97.8 +/- 13.9
  Background counts = 27.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Jul 15 01:52:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.29'
[Sun Jul 15 03:09:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 03:09:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.07"
[Sun Jul 15 03:09:21 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.970
[Sun Jul 15 03:09:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.07"
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 379.403000, observed total counts = 335.000000
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 26
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 04:04:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 09:00:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 09:00:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.07"
[Sun Jul 15 09:00:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.970
[Sun Jul 15 09:00:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.07"
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0601390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 15.048781 pixels away
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 09:23:33 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9