[Sun May 20 03:15:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (181.1, 415.2) = 21 24 25.59 42 27 55.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.2 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 23.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May 20 03:15:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.00'
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.43"
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.931
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 12.43"
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Source 6 is offset by -2.939778 and 0.218610 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.597747 x 1.597747, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 10.892799 pixels away
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9