[Sun May 20 03:15:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (370.1, 419.0) = 21 23 11.28 42 28 12.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 58.9 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 21.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May 20 03:15:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.17'
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.51"
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.606
[Sun May 20 04:45:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 11.51"
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Sun May 20 05:08:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 15.779757 pixels away
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 05:26:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 06:43:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 06:43:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.51"
[Sun May 20 06:43:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.606
[Sun May 20 06:43:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 11.51"
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun May 20 06:49:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0601270101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 15.779757 pixels away
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 07:00:32 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9