[Tue May  1 13:42:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (360.5, 328.9) = 3 55 7.84 31 3 52.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 903.8 +/- 59.4
  Background counts = 1063.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0007

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.01'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 8.93"
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 85 centroid is now closest to src. 95
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source 93 is offset by 8.618434 and -0.203212 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.258253 x 9.127265, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source is confused with source 94
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 8.93"
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes