[Tue May  1 13:42:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (374.9, 328.0) = 3 55 2.95 31 3 45.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 457.6 +/- 48.3
  Background counts = 893.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.95'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.40"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.271
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 9.40"
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84 appears to have run properly
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source 92 is offset by 0.557851 and -2.512258 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.109844 x 1.109844, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 84 centroid is now closest to src. 94
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 11896.000000, observed total counts = 9711.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source is confused with source 94
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.40"
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.271
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 9.40"
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68 appears to have run properly