[Tue May  1 13:42:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (238.1, 406.3) = 3 55 49.28 31 9 29.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1380.4 +/- 48.3
  Background counts = 330.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.96'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.91"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.885
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 10.91"
[Wed May  2 15:32:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3835.450000, observed total counts = 2631.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.91"
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.885
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 10.91"
[Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes