[Tue May 1 13:42:34 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (193.8, 395.9) = 3 56 4.30 31 8 43.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 498.3 +/- 37.0 Background counts = 305.1 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0003 [Tue May 1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.36' [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.61" [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.896 [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 11.61" [Wed May 2 15:32:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:33 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61 appears to have run properly [Wed May 2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:36 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61 appears to have run properly [Tue May 8 21:21:10 2012] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 67 at 14.647615 pixels away [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.61" [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.896 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 1, mean size = 11.61" [Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:17 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51 appears to have run properly