[Tue May 1 13:42:26 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (354.5, 295.8) = 3 55 9.87 31 1 27.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 1196.2 +/- 56.3 Background counts = 1149.7 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0007 [Tue May 1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.07' [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.502 [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 8.46" [Wed May 2 15:32:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 2 15:32:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:21:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 115 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source 24 is offset by -2.759605 and -4.851004 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.081499 x 1.081499, not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.502 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 8.46" [Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes