[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (255.0, 503.2) = 3 55 43.58 31 16 31.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 422.7 +/- 33.7
  Background counts = 227.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.17'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.01"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.155
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 113 for pass 0, mean size = 14.01"
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.01"
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.155
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 14.01"
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes