[Tue May 1 13:42:43 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (336.5, 257.1) = 3 55 15.99 30 58 39.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 351.7 +/- 38.6 Background counts = 999.7 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005 [Tue May 1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.07' [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.711 [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 108 for pass 0, mean size = 8.46" [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.711 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 1, mean size = 8.46" [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes