[Tue May 1 13:42:40 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (262.5, 291.0) = 3 55 41.00 31 1 5.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 418.3 +/- 31.5 Background counts = 806.1 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003 [Tue May 1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.66' [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76" [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.528 [Tue May 1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 7.76" [Wed May 2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7646.730000, observed total counts = 6043.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 110 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76" [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.528 [Tue May 8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 7.76" [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes