[Tue May  1 13:42:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (389.4, 303.1) = 3 54 58.07 31 1 52.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 179.2 +/- 37.3
  Background counts = 710.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.60'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.73"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.001
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 9.73"
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5994.020000, observed total counts = 4875.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 105
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source 105 is offset by 5.026759 and 1.709759 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.969563 x 1.621903, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9