[Tue May  1 13:42:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (284.1, 305.1) = 3 55 33.71 31 2 6.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 422.2 +/- 45.1
  Background counts = 1106.1
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0007

[Tue May  1 13:42:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.15'
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.00"
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.505
[Tue May  1 14:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 7.00"
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed May  2 15:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 93 centroid is now closest to src. 109
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source 102 is offset by 8.512643 and -2.360818 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.805752 x 0.805752, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:11 2012] Source is confused with source 109
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.00"
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.505
[Tue May  8 21:23:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 1, mean size = 7.00"
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes