[Tue May  1 13:43:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (283.3, 275.2) = 3 55 33.97 30 59 57.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 298.4 +/- 36.2
  Background counts = 412.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.01'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.44"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.820
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 0, mean size = 7.44"
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 101
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4745.680000, observed total counts = 4751.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 4.121640 pixels
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 49 to 55
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] 4844.139000 total counts/ 4621.860000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.269565
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 4.121640 pixels
  Position = (279.9, 272.8) = 3 55 35.11 30 59 47.7
  Extent = 9.9 (7.9-12.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 222.3 +/- 69.6
  Background counts = 4621.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 101
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.172
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 1, mean size = 9.88"