[Tue May  1 13:43:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (349.0, 285.9) = 3 55 11.74 31 0 43.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 636.0 +/- 47.0
  Background counts = 549.3
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.78'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.32"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.688
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 8.32"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 91 is offset by 7.657468 and -1.207187 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.507632 x 7.507632, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.32"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.688
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 8.32"