[Tue May  1 13:43:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (362.0, 325.0) = 3 55 7.32 31 3 33.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 440.0 +/- 33.6
  Background counts = 332.5
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.00'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.960
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 0, mean size = 8.93"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 77 is offset by 8.227111 and 2.237149 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 8.051586 x 8.051586, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 24
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.960
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 1, mean size = 8.93"