[Tue May  1 13:43:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (287.5, 337.2) = 3 55 32.57 31 4 25.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 579.0 +/- 44.4
  Background counts = 471.3
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.92'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.841
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 7.89"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 74 is offset by -6.329698 and 1.448811 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.303628 x 4.303628, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 74 is offset by -6.798480 and 1.727914 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.119540 x 5.119540, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.841
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 1, mean size = 7.89"