[Tue May  1 13:43:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (339.2, 345.9) = 3 55 15.04 31 5 5.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 256.1 +/- 33.6
  Background counts = 361.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.54'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.70"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.000
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 8.70"
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 70 is offset by -1.100910 and 7.916364 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.443766 x 1.443766, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.70"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.000
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 1, mean size = 8.70"