[Tue May  1 13:43:11 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.8, 366.1) = 3 55 14.17 31 6 34.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 172.6 +/- 27.0
  Background counts = 251.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.82'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.070
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 9.34"
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Source 58 is offset by 1.868253 and -7.033505 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.111315 x 1.111315, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3165.880000, observed total counts = 2738.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 58
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.070
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 9.34"