[Tue May  1 13:43:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (337.0, 407.8) = 3 55 15.79 31 9 35.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 138.9 +/- 24.0
  Background counts = 123.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.40'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.63"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.039
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 101 for pass 0, mean size = 10.63"
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Source 51 is offset by -1.462866 and -0.548453 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.435628 x 1.435628, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 49
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 48
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.63"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.039
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 10.63"