[Tue May  1 13:43:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.6, 427.1) = 3 55 14.21 31 11 0.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 176.6 +/- 23.2
  Background counts = 90.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.84'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.35"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.931
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 11.35"
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Warning: source 84 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 47 at 11.256350 pixels away
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 48
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 45
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 48
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.35"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.931
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 1, mean size = 11.35"