[Tue May 1 13:43:01 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (325.5, 313.8) = 3 55 19.68 31 2 47.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 34863.9 +/- 323.2 Background counts = 604.7 Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.003 [Tue May 1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.26' [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56" [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.599 [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.56" [Tue May 8 21:20:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:22:33 2012] Source 4 is offset by 7.369490 and 0.243986 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.859816 x 6.859816, not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:22:33 2012] Source 4 is offset by 7.458226 and -0.315093 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.948552 x 6.948552, not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:22:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 303519.000000, observed total counts = 264827.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 2 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56" [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.599 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.56"