[Tue May 1 13:43:05 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (303.6, 261.0) = 3 55 27.09 30 58 57.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 1231.1 +/- 54.5 Background counts = 438.4 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005 [Tue May 1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.74' [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80" [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.951 [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 7.80" [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8957.810000, observed total counts = 8566.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 3.405789 pixels [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] 8611.000000 total counts/ 6488.590000 bgd. counts: snr = 26.348392 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 3.405789 pixels Position = (304.8, 264.2) = 3 55 26.71 30 59 10.7 Extent = 15.6 (14.1-31.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 2122.4 +/- 92.8 Background counts = 6488.6 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0008 [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8131.820000, observed total counts = 8115.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.433288 pixels [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 21 to 42 [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] 8129.379000 total counts/ 7943.490000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.085682 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.433288 pixels Position = (303.9, 263.1) = 3 55 27.00 30 59 5.7 Extent = 5.8 (4.3-7.3)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 185.9 +/- 90.2 Background counts = 7943.5 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 27 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 103 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.83" [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 13, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.181 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 5.83"