[Tue May  1 13:43:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (364.5, 330.9) = 3 55 6.48 31 3 56.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 609.3 +/- 117.2
  Background counts = 341.5
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.34'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.10"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.633
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 9.10"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 75
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4148.860000, observed total counts = 4174.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 5.133598 pixels
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 28 to 98
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] 3681.620000 total counts/ 3228.190000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.980511
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 5.133598 pixels
  Position = (360.3, 333.8) = 3 55 7.92 31 4 13.0
  Extent = 13.8 (9.9-17.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 453.4 +/- 60.7
  Background counts = 3228.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 77
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 75
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.84"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.848
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 1, mean size = 13.84"