[Tue May  1 13:43:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (328.6, 370.9) = 3 55 18.65 31 6 55.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1108.6 +/- 48.8
  Background counts = 262.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.69'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.27"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.083
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 9.27"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6835.680000, observed total counts = 6183.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 22
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.27"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.083
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 9.27"