[Tue May  1 13:43:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (324.9, 308.9) = 3 55 19.89 31 2 26.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 53152.7 +/- 278.9
  Background counts = 635.1
  Rate = 0.5 +/- 0.003

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.06'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.46"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.662
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.46"
[Tue May  8 21:20:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Source 2 is offset by 4.066872 and -0.149492 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.433292 x 5.587678, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 4
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 3
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.46"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.662
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.46"