[Tue May 1 13:43:03 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (331.1, 381.6) = 3 55 17.79 31 7 42.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 1112.5 +/- 44.9 Background counts = 219.1 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005 [Tue May 1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.48' [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67" [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.911 [Sun May 6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 9.67" [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv [Tue May 8 21:20:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 21:22:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 58 [Tue May 8 21:22:34 2012] Source 17 is offset by -7.657179 and -5.092696 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.091522 x 1.091522, not incorporating fit results [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:22:35 2012] Source is confused with source 21 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67" [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.911 [Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 9.67"