[Tue May  1 13:43:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.8, 314.2) = 3 55 34.49 31 2 47.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1370.8 +/- 58.0
  Background counts = 519.1
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0006

[Tue May  1 13:43:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.66'
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.26"
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.691
[Sun May  6 17:57:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 7.26"
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May  8 21:20:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 21:20:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:22:33 2012] Source 13 is offset by -5.208633 and 0.122403 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.712943 x 2.712943, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:22:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.26"
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.691
[Tue May 15 23:17:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.26"