[Tue May  1 13:42:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.5, 260.1) = 3 55 27.83 30 58 52.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 221.9 +/- 33.2
  Background counts = 407.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 13:42:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.79'
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.82"
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.946
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 0, mean size = 7.82"
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 17:57:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4045.800000, observed total counts = 4072.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 3.220907 pixels
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 57 to 39
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] 4125.547000 total counts/ 3622.260000 bgd. counts: snr = 8.362303
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 3.220907 pixels
  Position = (303.7, 257.7) = 3 55 27.08 30 58 42.3
  Extent = 16.0 (16.0-32.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 503.3 +/- 64.2
  Background counts = 3622.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4237.110000, observed total counts = 4307.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 3.002221 pixels
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 39 to 80
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] 4264.196000 total counts/ 4118.060000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.277251
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 3.002221 pixels
  Position = (304.6, 254.8) = 3 55 26.78 30 58 29.8
  Extent = 7.9 (5.5-12.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 146.1 +/- 65.3
  Background counts = 4118.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source is confused with source 44
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.94"
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.925
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 55 for pass 1, mean size = 7.94"
[Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.csv
[Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.csv
[Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55 appears to have run properly