[Tue May 1 13:42:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (281.2, 295.2) = 3 55 34.69 31 1 25.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 306.8 +/- 39.2 Background counts = 475.0 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004 [Tue May 1 13:42:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.27' [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.07" [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.886 [Wed May 2 15:32:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 7.07" [Sun May 6 17:57:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists [Sun May 6 17:57:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 17:57:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45 appears to have run properly [Sun May 6 17:57:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists [Sun May 6 17:57:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 17:57:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45 appears to have run properly [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Warning: source 45 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 60 at 10.357887 pixels away [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 21:21:49 2012] Source is confused with source 3 [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.07" [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.886 [Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 1, mean size = 7.07" [Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg exists [Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv [Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg exists [Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv [Tue May 15 23:16:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists [Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists [Tue May 15 23:17:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44 appears to have run properly