[Tue May  1 13:42:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (147.3, 408.5) = 3 56 20.07 31 9 39.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.4 +/- 17.1
  Background counts = 73.8
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0001

[Tue May  1 13:42:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.55'
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.21"
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.980
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 13.21"
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 17:57:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Warning: source 89 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 17.012355 pixels away
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9