[Tue May  1 13:42:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (280.9, 321.1) = 3 55 34.77 31 3 18.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1108.7 +/- 55.5
  Background counts = 440.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  1 13:42:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.07'
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.47"
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.814
[Wed May  2 15:32:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 7.47"
[Sun May  6 17:57:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 17:57:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 17:57:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sun May  6 17:57:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 87
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6914.870000, observed total counts = 7290.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 3.165170 pixels
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 15 to 17
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] 6188.519000 total counts/ 5283.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 12.453327
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 3.165170 pixels
  Position = (277.9, 321.8) = 3 55 35.81 31 3 21.2
  Extent = 16.3" x 4.9", rotation angle = 14
  Source counts = 905.2 +/- 78.7
  Background counts = 5283.3
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0007
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 3.30
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source is confused with source 21
[Tue May  8 21:21:49 2012] Source is confused with source 20
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.64"
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.037
[Fri May 11 06:52:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 10.64"
[Tue May 15 23:16:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:16:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Tue May 15 23:16:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:16:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Tue May 15 23:16:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 23:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:17:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 23:17:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0600980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly