[Sat Jul 14 03:57:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (377.3, 233.2) = 20 22 55.86 11 27 41.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 153.0 +/- 21.1
  Background counts = 119.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Jul 14 03:57:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.42'
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.14"
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.999
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 10.14"
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source 95 is offset by -1.275773 and -0.509257 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.159766 x 1.159766, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1082.160000, observed total counts = 959.000000
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source is confused with source 88
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.14"
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.999
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 1, mean size = 10.14"
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Source 95 is offset by -1.299927 and -0.504866 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.159766 x 1.159766, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Warning, spatial fit 84 centroid is now closest to src. 96
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Warning: source 85 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 95 at 12.100516 pixels away
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:35 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32773.606720, 20241.358673, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:35 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:35 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (340, 196) - (415, 271)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:35 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32773.606720, 20241.358673, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34637.680000, 20059.234580, 1690.208049, 1690.208049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31128.322235, 21072.793045, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35565.407196, 19104.143250, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31114.911682, 22123.311142, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30212.095520, 22060.195786, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33566.230000, 21455.936500, 1610.672046, 1610.672046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29870.090576, 21492.484146, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30692.039856, 21546.819321, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32289.475403, 21358.332153, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32288.177094, 20747.543991, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32949.595337, 20648.715836, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33850.640594, 19954.699142, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35250.934906, 19696.076721, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34543.085510, 19282.060745, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:35 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif
[Sat Jul 14 22:53:54 2012] Mean detx,y = (-9706.27, -540.16) 
[Sat Jul 14 22:53:58 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Jul 14 22:54:16 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Jul 14 22:54:17 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Jul 14 22:54:17 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 00:24:15 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jul 15 00:24:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:32 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:32 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:34 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:34 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00207, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.arf
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:34 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:34 2012] Updating source flux to 1.1e-14
[Sun Jul 15 01:41:50 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting