[Sat Jul 14 03:57:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (356.8, 168.4) = 20 23 1.92 11 23 0.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 109.7 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 73.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Jul 14 03:57:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.34'
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.574
[Sat Jul 14 04:02:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 11.60"
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sat Jul 14 09:41:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:36 2012] Warning: source 50 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 52 at 10.226921 pixels away
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 14 12:32:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.574
[Sat Jul 14 12:33:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 1, mean size = 11.60"
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:32:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 575.635000, observed total counts = 458.000000
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 52
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:34 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(30993.120178, 14598.781555, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:34 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52_src.reg
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:34 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (319, 131) - (394, 206)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:34 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(30993.120178, 14598.781555, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28874.077576, 17464.001556, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jul 14 21:36:34 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52.gif
[Sat Jul 14 22:25:50 2012] Mean detx,y = (-10528.55, -6504.31) 
[Sat Jul 14 22:25:53 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Jul 14 22:26:06 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Jul 14 22:26:07 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Jul 14 22:26:07 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 00:10:39 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jul 15 00:10:39 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:31 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:31 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:33 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:33 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00148, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0600690101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src52.arf
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:33 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jul 15 01:40:33 2012] Updating source flux to 1.9e-14
[Sun Jul 15 01:41:50 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting