[Mon Jan 23 10:16:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (188.3, 285.5) = 0 43 33.81 41 14 7.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.4 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 28.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Jan 23 10:16:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.04'
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.45"
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.890
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 10.45"
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:37 2012] Source 98 is offset by -8.434393 and -1.151496 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.212156 x 1.212156, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Warning: source 88 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 98 at 13.591389 pixels away
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8