[Mon Jan 23 10:16:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (456.9, 278.8) = 0 41 50.23 41 13 32.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.4 +/- 11.9
  Background counts = 25.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Jan 23 10:16:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.57'
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.22 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.22"
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.822
[Mon Jan 23 10:20:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 12.22"
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 16:04:54 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Source 102 is offset by -7.732717 and -4.557871 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.386745 x 1.386745, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 295.999000, observed total counts = 296.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 102 = 0.137924 pixels
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] 284.599600 total counts/ 220.084000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.348811
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 102 = 0.137924 pixels
  Position = (456.8, 279.0) = 0 41 50.25 41 13 35.7
  Extent = 6.6 (5.2-9.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 64.5 +/- 16.9
  Background counts = 220.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9