[Mon Jan 23 10:18:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (346.0, 139.1) = 0 42 33.01 41 3 27.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 161.0 +/- 15.8
  Background counts = 7.8
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0009

[Mon Jan 23 10:18:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.06'
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.46"
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.795
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 12.46"
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 93 at 16.300520 pixels away
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jan 24 09:00:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan 24 09:00:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.46"
[Tue Jan 24 09:00:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.795
[Tue Jan 24 09:00:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 12.46"
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 24 12:46:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 24 12:47:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 401.220000, observed total counts = 401.000000
[Tue Jan 24 12:47:36 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 7.712714 pixels
[Tue Jan 24 12:47:36 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 59 to 42
[Tue Jan 24 12:47:36 2012] 404.315047 total counts/ 404.315000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000002
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 7.712714 pixels
  Position = (347.2, 146.7) = 0 42 32.56 41 4 1.2
  Extent = 24.1 (3.0-45.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 20.1
  Background counts = 404.3
  Rate = 3e-09 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability