[Mon Jan 23 10:18:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (297.4, 332.1) = 0 42 51.73 41 17 28.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 49.2 +/- 12.7
  Background counts = 31.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Jan 23 10:18:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.44'
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.65"
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.931
[Mon Jan 23 19:45:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 7.65"
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:43:16 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0600660201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Source 65 is offset by 3.638535 and 6.115281 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.115310 x 5.115310, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jan 23 23:44:09 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9