[Mon Jun 10 18:18:38 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (375.9, 299.2) = 0 5 49.22 20 13 8.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 736.0 +/- 36.6
  Background counts = 259.2
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Jun 10 18:18:41 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.62'
[Mon Jun 10 18:26:21 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 18:26:21 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.24"
[Mon Jun 10 18:26:21 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.545
[Mon Jun 10 18:26:21 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 9.24"
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun 10 21:25:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2624.570000, observed total counts = 1983.000000
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Source 9 is offset by 0.601749 and -1.895092 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.094795 x 1.094795, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:36 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:36 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.24"
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:36 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.545
[Mon Jun 10 23:43:36 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 9.24"
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun 11 02:25:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2657.940000, observed total counts = 1983.000000
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Source 9 is offset by 0.601497 and -1.895437 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.094336 x 1.094336, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 11 04:56:39 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 11 04:57:12 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32658.434204, 25984.048981, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 11 04:57:12 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Tue Jun 11 04:57:12 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (338, 262) - (413, 337)
[Tue Jun 11 04:57:12 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32658.434204, 25984.048981, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31549.513428, 28512.558167, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33290.803772, 26739.200378, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30622.261400, 25359.367600, 454.996813, 347.238410, 77.351557, X, Y) && !ellipse(36513.960000, 25025.448000, 1761.600051, 483.140814, 141.400000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30507.520160, 23872.910800, 449.762303, 449.762303, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 11 04:57:12 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Tue Jun 11 05:30:16 2013] Mean detx,y = (-7362.78, 3686.69) 
[Tue Jun 11 05:30:23 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jun 11 05:30:47 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jun 11 05:30:47 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 11 05:30:47 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 11 07:41:59 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Jun 11 07:41:59 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz = 1443.00
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz = 8100.00
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1100592.000000, 9160780.000000
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (375.9, 299.2) = 0 5 49.22 20 13 8.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 469.9 +/- 39.0
  Background aperture counts = 973.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Tue Jun 11 11:31:56 2013] Set source signif. to 469.85/31.20 = 15.06
[Tue Jun 11 11:32:13 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jun 11 11:32:13 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0043, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Tue Jun 11 11:32:13 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jun 11 11:32:13 2013] Updating source flux to 2.3e-14
[Tue Jun 11 11:32:49 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Tue Jun 11 11:33:11 2013] xmm0600540601/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0600540601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete