[Wed Aug 8 03:08:05 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (186.6, 251.9) = 6 32 20.79 -23 27 26.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 42.2 +/- 7.9 Background counts = 3.3 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Wed Aug 8 03:08:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.78' [Wed Aug 8 03:26:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Aug 8 03:26:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.82" [Wed Aug 8 03:26:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.700 [Wed Aug 8 03:26:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 10.82" [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 03:37:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 71.349000, observed total counts = 64.000000 [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 1.304737 pixels [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] 71.623000 total counts/ 36.613300 bgd. counts: snr = 5.785874 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 1.304737 pixels Position = (187.9, 251.7) = 6 32 20.39 -23 27 25.9 Extent = 6.2" x 4.5", rotation angle = 355 Source counts = 35.0 +/- 8.5 Background counts = 36.6 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009 [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Aug 8 03:49:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.38 [Wed Aug 8 04:04:46 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Aug 8 04:04:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.32" [Wed Aug 8 04:04:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.505 [Wed Aug 8 04:04:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 5.32" [Wed Aug 8 04:14:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 04:14:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 04:14:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 04:14:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 04:14:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Aug 8 04:14:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 04:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 04:14:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 8 04:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Wed Aug 8 04:14:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 2 [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Aug 8 04:26:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.38 [Wed Aug 8 04:43:29 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(16297.948741, 21849.969699, 370.332195, 268.574006, 355.465516, X, Y) [Wed Aug 8 04:43:29 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6_src.reg [Wed Aug 8 04:43:29 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (167, 230) - (209, 273) [Wed Aug 8 04:43:29 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(16297.948741, 21849.969699, 617.220324, 1234.440649, X, Y) [Wed Aug 8 04:43:29 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6.gif [Wed Aug 8 04:47:09 2012] Mean detx,y = (5424.83, 6686.69) [Wed Aug 8 04:47:10 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Aug 8 04:47:25 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Aug 8 04:47:25 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Aug 8 04:47:25 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Aug 8 04:51:21 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 35 counts [Wed Aug 8 04:51:21 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00364, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0600530101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6.arf [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Aug 8 04:59:11 2012] Updating source flux to 1e-13 [Wed Aug 8 04:59:12 2012] Source 6 has fewer than 100.000000 counts, skipping spectral fitting